Killers of the Flower Moon (2023) #SherylPuthur

Directed By: Martin Scorsese

Screenplay By: Eric Roth; Martin Scorsese

Cast: Leonardo DiCaprio; Robert De Niro; Lily Gladstone; Jesse Plemons; Tantoo Cardinal; Cara Jade Myers; JaNae Collins; Jillian Dion; Jason Isbell; William Belleau; John Lithgow; Brendan Fraser

Language: English; Osage                                             

Genre: Crime; Drama; Western

Run Time: 3 hours 26 minutes

Martin Scorsese’s Killers of the Flower Moon delves into the infamous history of the Osage Murders known as the Reign of Terror. However, unlike the eponymous book which is a non-fictional investigative text on the Bureau of Investigation’s efforts (later FBI) at uncovering the murders and cover-ups in Oklahoma, the film’s focal point is through the marriage of Molly Kyle (Lily Gladstone) and Ernest Burkhart (Leonardo DiCaprio).

We are told that the Osage Nation were forced to move to Oklahoma, an arid patch of land, giving up their ancestral spaces. They found oil in these lands making them overnight one of the richest communities in the US. The oil brought unbelievable wealth but it also brought white profiteers who believed that they had to ‘rescue’ the land and its wealth from the ‘incompetent people’ who own it. The Osage, according to US law, were declared ‘incompetent’ by the government and were given white benefactors/overseers who managed their property and gave them an allowance.

Into such a background, we have the entry of Ernest Burkhart. Discharged from service during the WWI, he comes to live with his uncle William Hale (Robert De Niro) or King Hale as he was known. Ernest, we are told, was a cook in the army. He was discharged because his injury would not permit him to do hard labour. We realise also that he is dim-witted. He is thus presented right from the beginning as a harmless man who cannot be a threat. And yet, a perfect pawn.

We see that Molly and Ernest are happily married; he is a devoted father and husband. But King Hale continues to be a spectre looming over not just Molly’s family but the entire community since he has ingratiated himself to the Osage Nation by learning the language, the customs and seemingly respecting it.

We are shown frequent, brutal deaths with obvious perpetrators and yet the fact that no one questions it means that they are performed with the tacit approval of the local law enforcement agency. There is a sham of a medical service – ‘treatment’ for the Osage illnesses as well as coroners who are hiding the cause of death rather than revealing it. Even the illnesses plaguing the Osage such as diabetes are not discussed in detail, but in passing referenced as a result of the consumption of a white diet unsuitable to the Osage. These conversations seemingly bemoaning the poor health practises is matched by high sugar dishes being served constantly.

Much more deep-seated is a racial framework that believes that the Osage, like other Native American tribespeople, do not deserve autonomy. They are not even seen as people. One of the most chilling dialogues is, when there is a discussion planning out the murder of Molly’s sister Reta (JaNae Collins) and her white husband (Jason Isbell). They are referenced as “a man and his blanket” – she is reduced to the traditional wearing blanket that Osage women wore and maybe the fact that she is but just his financial safety net. Marriage to white men, gave the Osage women seeming control over their property but in reality, the white overseer was now not court-appointed but the husband.  

Even the fact that the Osage Nation needed to pay the FBI to conduct an investigation points out at the flawed state of affairs. One of the scenes that is increasingly repeated to a disturbing effect, is Molly looking at an intimate family gathering and finding it slowly filling up with unfamiliar people – they are white, ‘family’, smiling and yet dangerous. Even the scenes of the house’s interior, starkly changes from when she first invites Ernest over for dinner to when it is teeming with white people. The whole thing works like a metaphor for the settler colony that America is.

Much of the criticism levelled against the film has been about how it is more about white people and not the Osage expressing themselves in primary positions. However, when the point is to poke holes in racial privilege, it needs to come from a space where it becomes harder and harder to justify. Other peoples’ emotions can be discounted – ‘oh they feel too much’ – but buffoonery? Harder to explain.

The players engaging in it may be entirely oblivious of the flaws of their argument because to begin with, racism is one of those systems founded not on logic, because reason cannot be the bedrock of prejudice, but a blind cult-like belief. And nothing is more blinding than greed. We see that reflected when Ernest, in a scene similar to Molly’s disquiet at the unfamiliarity of her intimate family gathering, walks into the Hale house and is faced by grim-faced white people who look strangely alike and frightening. And much like a cult, they brainwash Ernest to parrot their ideas.

Personally, the film played out like a black comedy crime thriller because the conclusion seemed obvious. Even if you wanted to wish it away, it was like a foregone calamity – a complete train wreck. There is romance in Killers of the Flower Moon but it is not a romance. It is the antithesis. It is a betrayal.

From The Shadows (2022) #SherylPuthur

Directed By: Miriam Chandy Menacherry

Screenplay By: Triparna Banerjee

Featured: Leena Kejriwal; Hasina Kharbhih; Samina; Ella; Zinna Ali Laskar; Shakti; Krishna; Shampa; Seema Saha

Language: English; Hindi; Bengali                                                   

Genre: Documentary

Run Time: 75 minutes

From the Shadows is a documentary film that explores the heavy and pertinent issue of trafficking in India. The narrative follows two different women in their journey to bring the women, girls, children —justice. What truly brings out the grit in this fight is the active involvement of the girls who have been impacted by trafficking and are choosing to speak out.

We follow Leena Kejriwal through the streets of Kolkata where she uses different stencils of a girl’s silhouette to create the shadow of a girl with – #missingirls on the walls. The thing to note about sex trafficking is that unless you have been personally impacted by it, it is easy to pretend that it is not happening around you. The shadows, the hashtags are there then to force a conversation that needs to happen for change to actually occur. Leena’s work can be found in different cities.

Through Leena, we are introduced to Samina (name changed to protect her identity) who is fighting to get her case into the courts of law so that the people who were responsible for having her sold might be punished for their crime. The worst of it is that they live in her neighbourhood, unaffected. She has a desire for closure which is thwarted because of the roadblocks in her access for legal justice. Leena works with her to support her case because convictions in trafficking cases are notoriously hard.

Hasina Kharbhih’s work brings us to the greater possibilities of legal redressal and the dangers in its pursuit. Her legal struggle to get Ella, a young woman who escaped and sought justice, was dangerous because of the threats made to their lives. Largely since there is big money involved and many hands get greased to smoothen such operations built on the bodies of young children.

Nevertheless, Ella’s story is a story of victory in that she is able to get her conviction. Hasina’s work explores the larger political frameworks that needs to be sensitized to reduce trafficking. Which is why her work is aimed at engaging with border forces of India, Bangladesh, Nepal so that these women can be found before they are spirited further away.

We are given insight into what motivates these women who are seemingly outside of the struggle in comparison to Samina and Ella, to fight, to invest their time and energy into a battle that is both exhausting as well as disheartening – both in terms of the little returns as well as the exposure to the heartbreaking stories of violence and betrayal that is inevitable in these cases.

One of the most inspiring incidents that the film covers, is that of Seema Saha, a school student who successfully stops the child marriage of a classmate. She also works with other teens in creating a map of safe spaces in their locality that could be circulated for the people to be made aware of. The authorities do not take their concerns seriously – a behaviour pattern that reflects the assumptions made about children as well as the general apathy that people feel when such concerns are voiced.

What is fascinating about From the Shadows is not the theme or the fact that it acknowledges that the fight against crimes of this nature is an arduous struggle but that it equally focuses on the positives. There is an actual possibility to get justice; it is not easy nor will it be soon and maybe not for everyone but it is possible.

From the Shadows uses shadow art, street art, and other forms that imply temporality, fragility and yet it underscores the idea that art can be political; that it can be used to make a statement. That street art can begin an important conversation that needs to happen incessantly. In fact, Miriam Chandy Menacherry herself dove into this story, the struggle, because of art. We are then reminded that art can power social critique. Trafficking may be an ongoing problem but it is one that needs to be made visible.

Red, White & Royal Blue (2023) #SherylPuthur

Directed By: Matthew Lopez

Screenplay By: Matthew Lopez and Ted Malawer

Cast: Taylor Zakhar Perez; Nicholas Galitzine; Clifton Collins Jr; Sarah Shahi; Rachel Hilson; Stephen Fry; Uma Thurman; Ellie Bamber; Thomas Flynn; Malcolm Atobrah; Akshay Khanna; Sharon D. Clarke; Aneesh Sheth; Juan Castano

Language: English                                                  

Genre: Romantic Comedy

Run Time: 2 hours

Red, White & Royal Blue is based on the eponymous bestseller by Casey McQuiston. It is a romantic comedy of enemies into lovers.

On the one hand, we have Alex Claremont-Diaz (Taylor Zakhar Perez), the son of the first female American President Ellen Claremont (Uma Thurman) and on the other, Prince Henry (Nicholas Galitzine) of the English Royal Family. They had met many years ago and did not get along too well due to a misunderstanding. Things continue along in a cold war of sorts till matters come to a point of no return when Alex and Henry bicker at the wedding of Prince Philip (Thomas Flynn), Henry’s older brother. This tiff causes an international incident because they end up toppling the 75000-pound wedding cake.

The White House and the Palace agree that there needs to be some PR damage control done to salvage the situation. They thus force the two to spend time together in public events to spin the story that they are actually great friends.

The time that they spend together, helps them understand each other’s’ worlds, leading to a non-platonic relationship. But is it possible for a Prince of England to reveal his deep affection for a man, especially when he is the First Son of the United States of America?

Red, White & Royal Blue is a fun rom-com but it does seem rather too neat. Like a well-scrubbed, neatly polished narrative. While it doesn’t seem fair to bring in a comparison with the novel, since film adaptations of books are generally rather criticised. But the book has something that the film adapts only in parts – the ordinary and the messy.

Some of the best moments in the film are what seem like run-of-the-mill, unplanned, messy moments that bring the heart into the story. Alex and Henry messaging each other or Alex’s conversation with his mother.

The novel has many of such moments especially with Alex’s sister, a character snipped out of the film, or the complicated elements of his parents’ marriage, even Henry’s relationship with his sister Beatrice (Ellie Bamber). The book acknowledges the imperfections of life and the beauty that comes from it. It is a much more political story and yet is unabashedly a feel-good romantic comedy.

Red, White & Royal Blue is a well-cast film with good performances but it does suffer from being too sanitised. The film tones down the romantic sexual tension that is inherent to the film and necessary to a story of people falling headlong into an enriching romance. It then becomes like a pretty candy bar that was left out too long and is now a little dry.

It is, nevertheless, a fun, enjoyable watch.

Dune (2021) #SherylPuthur

Directed By: Denis Villeneuve

Written By: Jon Spaiths; Denis Villeneuve and Eric Roth

Cast: Timothee Chalamet; Rebecca Ferguson; Oscar Isaac; Josh Brolin; Stellan Skargard; Dave Bautista; Stephen McKinley Henderson; Zendaya; Chang Chen; Sharon Duncan-Brewster; Charlotte Rampling; Jason Momoa; Javier Bardem

Language: English                                                      

Genre: Science-Fiction; Thriller

Denis Villeneuve’s Dune is an adaptation of Frank Herbert’s 1965 novel Dune. It adapts the first part of the novel that looks into the journey and rise of Paul Atreides (Timothee Chalamet). Set in the year 10191, the universe is run like a feudal system with different noble houses running planets, all of which owe allegiance to the Padishah Emperor.

On the water-rich planet Caladan, the homeworld of House Atreides, the Duke Leto (Oscar Isaac), his concubine Lady Jessica (Rebecca Ferguson) and their son Paul are preparing to relocate to the planet Arrakis – a desert planet known only for its abundant sources of the mystic spice Melange – known to elevate the limits of the mind. The spice is a highly prized commodity, because it ensures safe inter-galactic travel, besides other things.

The Fremen,the tribes that live on Arrakis, have had to see their land ravaged by Outworlders, like the House Harkonnen, who colonise, extract the spice and destroy the planet. The Atreides relocation is fraught with political danger and combined with Paul’s strange visions, there seem to be other dangers lurking.

The film manages to do justice to the source material, retaining the grandeur of the experience. It also eases viewers into a world that is clearly unfamiliar by weaving the information seamlessly into the story. It explores the various cultural and political aspects in the book, albeit tentatively which justifies the cliff-hanger ending since there is much that needs to be answered.

The haunting soundtrack, coupled with stellar performances heightens the grandeur of the film. The realistic inclusion of the almost mystic techniques of the spiritual/psychological espionage network – the Bene Gesserit; a group who function like a shadow government introduces us to a reality where technology is meant to only assist the human and not become smarter. Yet the medieval attitudes and systems at play makes one wonder as to what human advancement is supposed to look like.

Dune part one sets the stage and whets the appetite for a sci-fi experience, if a little intense. It remains to be seen how part two will build on the ideas of politics and religion embedded in Herbert’s novel and do justice to it as a cinematic undertaking.

Enola Holmes (2020) #SherylPuthur

Directed By: Harry Bradbeer

Written By: Jack Thorne

Cast: Millie Bobby Brown – Enola Holmes; Henry Cavill – Sherlock Holmes; Sam Claflin – Mycroft Holmes; Helena Bonham Carter – Eudoria Holmes; Louis Partridge – Viscount Tewkesbury; Burn Gorman – Linthorn ; Adeel Akhtar – Det. Lestrade; Susie Wokoma – Edith

Language: English                                                      

Genre: Action; Comedy; Mystery

Enola Holmes is a 2020 Netflix release based on the author Nancy Springer’s Sherlock pastiche series – The Enola Holmes Mysteries. In 1929, Virginia Woolf in her seminal text A Room of One’s Own wrote about ‘what if Shakespeare had a sister who was equally brilliant?’  Keeping in mind that Shakespeare lived in the 1600s, one can imagine how Woolf’s thought experiment went but Enola Holmes is set in the 1800s when the Suffragist movement had begun to take off, so the narrative takes on an interesting trajectory.

Enola (Millie Bobby Brown) is a plucky, intelligent girl whose 16th birthday is marred by the disappearance of her mother Eudoria (Helena Bonham Carter) and the appearance of her two older brothers Mycroft (Sam Claflin) and Sherlock (Henry Cavill). They haven’t seen her in years and they respond to her in markedly different ways. Mycroft is aghast at her wild behaviour and as her legal guardian decides to send her to finishing school (a rather ominous sounding space). Sherlock recognises a kindred spirit but isn’t in the habit of getting involved in people’s lives.

Enola decides to take matters into her own hands and goes in search of her mother. But her journey is halted by her meeting the runaway lord, Viscount Tewkesbury (Louis Partridge) whose escape from his family’s demands leads to a dangerous chase for his life. Enola wants to go her own way but now she has two mysteries to solve all while eluding her brothers, a sinister villain and society’s limitations.

The story overturns socially limiting roles such as widowhood – a disguise that Enola uses, besides cross-dressing as a young boy – all to access a certain freedom of movement denied to women. The film is political in its questions on what is it to be British. Laudably on one end, the protection of the natural resources of the land and problematically on the other, the maintenance of status quo.

The film, with its focus on the exploits of a fictional sister of Sherlock Holmes, manages to hold its own without getting sucked in the cult of Sherlock; by Enola breaking the fourth wall to convey her opinions as opposed to being spoken for. None of the male characters get reduced to cardboard cut-outs – an oft-repeated criticism against stories with titular female characters. Even Viscount Tewkesbury, who may need Enola’s skills to survive death threats, is able to offer his prodigious knowledge of the natural world so that they can survive. The film then offers us a heroine who is learning to construct a world that does not have to be an either/or choice because as a thinking woman, she has the necessary skills to fight the villains of the story – the established order of society.

 

The Duke of Burgundy (2014) #SherylPuthur

Directed and Written By: Peter Strickland

Cast:

Sidse Babett Knudsen – Cynthia

Chiara D’Anna – Evelyn

Monica Swinn – Lorna

Eugenia Caruso – Dr.Fraxini

Fatma Mohamed – The Carpenter

Kata Bartsch – Dr. Lurida

Eszter Tompa – Dr. Viridana

Zita Kraszko – Dr. Schuller

Language: English                                                       

Genre: Drama; Romance

The Duke of Burgundy is a 2014 British romance drama. Set in an idyllic location, it opens with a long peaceful sequence of the countryside and of Evelyn (Chiara D’Anna) cycling past it leisurely. She stops by streams, observes everything around her and then makes her way to her place of work.

Evelyn works as a maid and apprentice at the house of a seemingly curt and imperious lepidopterist Cynthia (Sidse Babett Knudsen). Their interactions are discomfiting because there seems to be a very obvious attempt on Cynthia’s part to denigrate Evelyn. But, before you can give into that assumption, there is a realisation that laced into their interplay is a ritual of passion.

In fact, when the day to day sequences seem to repeat with very little change, and that Evelyn seems to be consciously getting late for work, one begins to see more into their relationship. It is with that awareness that the power dynamic shifts.

Unchanging, could be the most important motif in the film because even the title sequence freeze into darkroom photographs. Throughout the film there are similar recurring still images, such as that of butterflies and moths mounted. They are lovingly maintained but lifeless. It is the ritual of studying the species out of its environment and when it’s dead. This metaphor runs into the viewer’s understanding of Evelyn and Cynthia’s relationship.

The film has an all female cast including in the lecture segments. Strangely enough, there are female mannequins placed into that all female audience. Since it is a female only world, many beliefs about sexuality and gender are voided.

By stripping it of such assumptions, it explores the dynamics of a romantic relationship. Is control and power in the relationship easily apparent, even if plays out as dominant-submissive? What about the insecurities that seep into such an intimate spaces especially when there both different expectations as well as limitations? And, how far do you compromise to keep a connection?  

The Duke of Burgundy is a richly textured film be it sound (the haunting OST by Cat’s Eyes), or image. As a film that looks more at the emotional toll that’s probably inevitable in a non-platonic bond, it may not be the average titillating erotica some might expect.

Weekend (2011) #SherylPuthur

Directed By: Andrew Haigh

Written By: Andrew Haigh

Cast:

Tom Cullen – Russell

Chris New – Glen

Jonathan Race – Jamie

Language: English                                                             Genre: Drama; Slice of Life

 

Weekend is the story of a one-night stand between two men Russell (Tom Cullen) and Glen (Chris New), that leads to something more. The story opens with Russell at his flat, smoking up. He seems to be dressing up to go somewhere but he ends up giving an impression that he wants to delay it, till it’s inevitable.  He ends up at his best friend Jamie’s (Jonathan Race) place for dinner. They are very close but he feels out of place either because he’s alone and they are all couples or that they are heterosexual and he has never truly accepted his place in the scheme of things.

He leaves early after making excuses and heads out to a gay bar where he checks out Glen but ends up chatting up someone else. Next day when they awake and Glen foists this art project that he has wherein he asks gay people who hook up for one-night stands to talk about the experience. To him, being homosexual is an identity gay people don’t acknowledge. This becomes rather apparent with the way Russell interacts with people. Interestingly, he too records his sexual encounters with people but does so privately, unlike Glen.

Their conversation, which crosses to the next day, becomes deeply political with its questions on identity, debates on relationships and open acknowledgment. It’s soon apparent that Russell lives non-confrontationally whereas Glen likes to sarcastically and belligerently, bring up his identity as a homosexual forward.

The relationship between Russell and Glen is for the weekend, like an extended one-night stand and this weekend could very well change things for them. The weekend takes them through an intensely emotional experience that gives some insight into how much harder a relationship could be for someone homosexual when society does not recognise or sanction it.

The relationship helps bring out Russell’s ambivalence about discussing his homosexuality with his friend Jamie. It helps bring them closer, because Russell has always closed off that side of his life from his closest friend, who knows that he is homosexual, but it is Russell’s discomfort that stops them from making a normal conversation about it. This becomes quite an interesting tangent to the narrative, for it points out that the general lack of acceptance as well as fascination/disgust from people around them, colours their friendships with heterosexual people.

It also overturns age-old stereotypes about homosexual relationships of who is ‘male’ and who is ‘female’ in it. The fact is that the power dynamics of being male and female (with its associated qualities) are constantly shifting in a homosexual relationship. The shifts occur in heterosexual relationships as well; just that no one acknowledges it.

Since the film with its brief canvas conveys the intensity of a relationship (because at the heart of it, it boils down to the human dynamics of a non-platonic relationship; sex and gender notwithstanding) as well as breaks stereotypes, it is a beautiful film to watch to normalise a relationship that has been needlessly politicised, romanticised and even more frequently, demonised.

Kes (1969) #SherylPuthur

kes-film-images-fd152e6d-6609-4e4e-bd96-7df64a76159Directed By: Ken Loach

Written By: Barry Hines; Ken Loach; Tony Garnett

Cast:

David Bradley– Billy Casper

Freddie Fletcher – Jud

Lynne Perrie– Mrs. Casper

Colin Welland– Mr. Farthing

Brian Glover– Mr. Sudgen

Bob Bowes– Mr. Gryce

Language: English                                                                   Genre: Drama

Kes is a 1969 film by Ken Loach based on the novel A Kestrel for a Knave by Barry Hines. Set in a mining town in Yorkshire, it tells the story of Billy (David Bradley), a working class boy. A fifteen year old who has nothing to look forward to in life. The only possible career option for him is to join his brother Jud (Freddie Fletcher) in the mining pits or some other similar blue collar job.

His daily struggles have to do with either combating or knuckling under abuse. It’s both his abusive older brother who uses him as his help, or his teachers and classmates who pick on him.

The teachers are jaded because none of the students show any involvement. It is after all understood that they will, in terms of profession, follow in their parents’ footsteps and end up in menial jobs. So the principal, Mr. Gryce (Bob Bowes), who was once passionate about his job is now an automaton who doles out advice and punishment in a mechanical fashion. Even his ‘lectures’ on discipline has an element of rote learning.

The school tries to instil values of mercy and compassion through religious passages but they are mere words that mean nothing. For instance, the morning assembly reading of the Parable of the Lost Sheep is immediately followed by the principal calling the students who were day-dreaming or yawning or coughing during the reading (including Billy) to his office for punishment. The narrative then abounds in such ironies.

Even the sadistic coach, Mr. Sudgen (Brian Glover), who uses Billy as a scapegoat for his failings and tortures him in the name of discipline in the shower room, by making him stand under a cold shower.

The truly uplifting moments in the film are when Billy takes up falconry and trains a kestrel that he names ‘Kes’. His concern for animals and his understanding of their behaviour patterns, belies the usual opinion that he is useless. An opinion his mother (Lynne Perrie) also holds.

Billy doesn’t see his kestrel as a pet but as someone with autonomy. The kestrel in fact, is a symbol of Billy and as an extension, the working class. They are free, untamed, proud yet fragile, they need to be protected, fed when hungry, taken outdoors away from controls and trusted to return.

The film gives no easy, quick fix solution. There is an English teacher who does attempt to draw out Billy but this isn’t a narrative of a teacher triumphing a student’s odds because they both come from a similar setting.

Kes is an unvarnished, darkly comic take on the English working class life.

What drew me to watch this movie was David Morrissey’s comment that this film made him hopeful to know that working class life could be the focus of a film. What kept me involved was the poignancy of Billy’s relationship with Kes.

Crimson Peak (2015) #SherylPuthur

Directed By: Guillermo del Toro

Written By: Guillermo del Toro and Matthew Robbins

Cast:

Mia Wasikowska – Edith Cushing

Jessica Chastain – Lady Lucille Sharpe

 Tom Hiddleston – Sir Thomas Sharpe

Charlie Hunnam – Dr. Alan McMichael

Jim Beaver – Carter Cushing

Burn Gorman – Mr. Holly

Language: English                                        Genre: Gothic Romance; Horror

 

Crimson Peak is a gothic horror romance by Guillermo del Toro. The film is not the usual horror as most would assume, instead also possesses all the stock elements of a gothic romance such as Jane Eyre.

The film begins with Edith (Mia Wasikowska) bloodied and shaken and then slowly slips back in time. She explains that since her mother’s death, she has seen ghosts and while frightened of them, she believes they have a purpose. In fact, her mother’s ghost comes to warn her about ‘Crimson Peak’ – a place, that when time comes, she should avoid.

Fast forward a few years, and we see Edith as an aspiring novelist and an eccentric heiress. Her father Carter Cushing (Jim Beaver) is worried she won’t settle down to a sensible marriage and tries to foist her old friend Alan (Charlie Hunnam) as a possible suitor.

Things change when two strangers from England come into her town – Sir Thomas Sharpe (Tom Hiddleston) and Lady Lucille Sharpe (Jessica Chastain), his sister. Sir Thomas approaches Mr. Cushing, with a business proposition. His lands on which his mansion Allerdale Hall stands is known for the finest red clay. He comes with a model for a clay mining machine that he believes will revolutionise clay mining.

He fails to make an impression on Mr. Cushing but he does, however, make Edith aware of him as a man. She finds herself attracted to him and her father tries to dissuade her from her fonder inclinations for him. They however, eventually marry but not before the mysteries that surround his home in England begin to envelope her and supernatural instances become more common. The house in fact, is known as Crimson Peak.

When they move to England, the claustrophobic fear of the old mansion, Allerdale Hall makes Edith uneasy. She slowly tries to uncover the secrets of the house and finds herself battling life and death.

While the narrative has, the usual trapping of a gothic story – a threatening mystery, looming curse over a doddering mansion, supernatural elements, hidden passages, it like Jane Eyre subverts binaries of male and female. Edith is not the typical damsel in distress rather she is strong-willed and knows her own mind. As a budding novelist, her figure of aspiration, as she mentions it, is Mary Shelley rather than Jane Austen; so a controversial figure as opposed to a respectable one.

The similarities between Crimson Peak and Jane Eyre don’t end there. Both Thornfield Hall and Allerdale Hall hide terrible secrets. And even when the two women suspect that there may be an unpleasant secret that the male protagonists are hiding, they continue to love them. It is rather like the old legend, Bluebeard’s Castle – a macabre story of warning.

There is an interesting scene when Lucille and Edith are in a park and looking at butterflies and Lucille’s conclusion is that beautiful things are fragile when Edith observes that they are dying. The scene isn’t openly menacing but conveys a lot of beliefs of the times that are subverted by the female leads themselves.

The story does have quite a few clichés, but at the same time it has a very interesting plot twist. The characterisation is very interesting as well, with well sketched out individuals. A lot has been said about the sex scene in the film. It is as egalitarian as spoken about (to read further check http://www.bustle.com/articles/117413-tom-hiddlestons-crimson-peak-sex-scene-is-ruled-by-mia-wasikowska-thats-a-big-deal).

The film cinematically retains an old world feel by using irises as a fade out almost episodically, quite like chapter ending in a book. This adds to the charm of the film.

Only Lovers Left Alive (2013) #SherylPuthur

OnlyLoversLeftAlive 1

Directed By: Jim Jarmusch

Written By: Jim Jarmusch

Cast:

Tilda Swinton – Eve

Tom Hiddleston – Adam

Mia Wasikowska – Ava

John Hurt – Christopher Marlowe

Anton Yelchin – Ian

Jeffrey Wright – Dr. Watson

Slimane Dazi – Bilal

Yasmine Hamdan – Yasmine

Language: English                                                                 Genre: Drama

 

Only Lovers Left Alive opens with an image of the night sky which slowly revolves into a gramophone record. The camera slowly spins, taking in Eve’s room (Tilda Swinton) in a circular fashion, and then Adam’s (Tom Hiddleston). The camera moves closer and as the song ends, they open their eyes because their day (our night) has begun.

The slow measured and lyrical pace of the opening sequence sets the stage for the film’s ambience. It reiterates the theme that they are vampires who have seen worlds come and go.

Jarmusch’s poetic tale of love tells the story of two vampires Adam and Eve, who have been married for centuries and hence believe in giving each other their space. Eve lives in Tangier and Adam in Detroit. They stay in touch in their own quaint way, which is telling of how they see the world. Eve is open to technology and hence uses an I-Phone whereas Adam has built his own communication system through outdated equipment.

Eve is adventurous and open to experiences. Her close friend is Kit (John Hurt), otherwise known as Christopher Marlowe who centuries ago staged his death and chose to continue writing. Some of his plays were attributed to his then contemporary Shakespeare. Kit considers Adam to be the prototype of Hamlet and tells Eve that if he had known him when he was writing it, it would have been perfect.

Adam, in contrast to Eve, is a recluse. He is an underground musician who influenced the careers of many artistes such as Schubert, whom he gave an adagio for a string quartet. He is a pack rat who collects instruments, creates music and conducts various experiments à la Tesla. He doesn’t like his music released and has a horror of crowds and too many people. So he procures his instruments through Ian (Anton Yelchin), a human who idolises him. He rarely steps out unless he needs to collect ‘good’ blood from Dr. Watson (Jeffrey Wright), who he meets dressed as a doctor with a face mask styling himself as Dr. Faust or Dr. Caligari (two interesting references).

Adam and Eve’s relationship is marked by old world charm, silent companionship and a fluidity of movements and thought that is beautiful. Their idea of small talk is philosophical conversations.

Adam’s despair at the ‘zombies’ or humans, is matched by Eve’s optimism. She has seen too much and for too long to be very depressed. But Adam’s tirade is a telling commentary on present society which he contrasts with his friends and the people he admires – Kafka, Tesla, Einstein, Schubert, Billie Holiday etc., who showed passion and involvement.

The dissonance in their relationship comes with the entry of Ava (Mia Wasikowska). Ava doesn’t understand their old world concerns and she is a threat to their carefully ordered world. Adam despises her for things she has done in the past and these are hinted upon.

The film is littered with literary puns and inter-textual references of music, film, philosophy, science and literature. It contemplates on the human race, art aesthetics, morality and the paradox of not wanting to live and living.

Beauty fades, but we want to possess it. Does living mean, loving too much and too fast because it cannot be held? Should we live in the moment and consider the consequences? Or should we be cautious about life? And most importantly, is morality and principles really important in the face of survival?

The film is a rich text that the viewer can luxuriate in. However, it will appeal most to someone who understands all the references. It is a postmodern film. After all, it makes Einstein’s Theory of Entanglement seem romantic –

“When you separate an entwined particle and you move both parts away from the other, even at opposite ends of the universe, if you alter or affect one, the other will be identically altered or affected.”